Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Junta Ikeda's avatar

Well said, Jim! I went through a phase where I wanted to copy all of the core variations from Chessable courses to my files in ChessBase, and I was way too greedy with how many courses I'd taken on over the months.

1. I wasn't smart enough to be more selective with courses, and

2. I let myself be tempted by quantity > quality, so my understanding of the moves was superficial.

Expand full comment
Lorenzo's avatar

I feel I had the exact mirror experience with chessable(even tough maybe it is because I am quite a bit weaker as a player, around 2200 fide). Similarly as the author, also for me openings were a weakness, and saw chessable as a way to put an end to this weakness. In a year I bought 3 lifetime's repertoires and completely changed my openings, learning variations by heart with spaced repetition (but clearly also trying to understand what I could).

The point is that the results form me were completely the opposite! After 10 months of this I did my best performance ever in a tournament achieving an IM norm. I think those chessable courses were an important part of that: in at least 3 games I overprepared IM level opposition, getting 1 draw and two wins as my opponents overpressed. So I really feel that against strong opponents Chessable repertoires transformed my results. But I agree that against lower/much lower rating opponents it is not such a great advantage. Especially with black, I already lost quite a bit of rating making dull draws in mainlines against 1900. So I ask, isn't maybe that bad tournament an exception due to poor form? Were those bad results repeated in time? Also, I think work with these repertoires lasts for long time, once variations are learned with spaced repetition one can slowly understand and assimilate them. Hopefully in the years to come you will be able to unleash all the power of the openings learned!

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts