Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Petr Slavik's avatar

Thank you so much for this article!

I finished reading the BASB book a few weeks ago and as I was pretty much clear about building a second brain in my professional activities, I am still pretty clueless in the area of chess.

Taking chess notes in an offline environment doesn't seem efficient to me, and sitting in front of a computer for extra hours (since my job is 100% computer based) - I don't really want to do that. But I guess there's no avoiding it :-)

I will start using Chessbase more and organize not only my games but also my sources of information in it.

You (and Tiago) are right in that one should (not only) in chess only process information that one currently needs and uses. Why to study an opening when there is a 0.1% chance that I will ever play it...

I'd also be interested to know what your work with Notion is like. Please, will you write a post about it sometime? Or make a video?

Expand full comment
neil preece's avatar

Indeed! To those who question why one should indulge in any form of meta chess learning activity at all, I would simply ask, "How much are you improving with your current training strategy?"

I suspect that in many cases the answer would be not much, but can you realistically expect serious improvement as an adult anyway? There is a pervasive self reinforcing negative loop in the mindsets of many adults and I believe that has been the biggest area of change in the last twenty years or so.

Barry Hymer and Peter Well's book on Chess Improvement looks at this real depth and there have been a string of wonderful books on the subject of chess training in general (Axel Smith, Davorin Kuljasevic etc). What knowledge management does is make these psychological and practical training systems more efficient.

Well that is what I am hoping for....

Thanks again for your newsletter...it is a consistently top rate read!

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts